In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.
In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift of £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had giv
en Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then
sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,00
0, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, the Charity Commission completed an investigation into this an
d censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers. In 1995, it was revealed that the Tate had accepted a gift o
f £20,000 from art fraudster John Drewe. The gallery had given Drewe access to its archives which he then used to forge
documents authenticating fake modern paintings that he then sold. In 2005, there was a scandal over the Tate's purchase
of its trustee Chris Ofili's work The Upper Room for £705,000, and accusations of conflict of interest. In July 2006, th
e Charity Commission completed an investigation into this and censured the gallery for acting outside its legal powers.